Articles

Cracking Freedom’s Foundation

By admin on December 14, 2011

House Chamber, Washington, D.C.- December 14, 2011

Mr. Speaker:

I rise in opposition to Section 1021 of the underlying Conference Report (H.R. 1540, the National Defense Authorization Act).  

This section specifically affirms that the President has the authority to deny due process to any American it charges with "substantially supporting al Qaeda, the Taliban or any 'associated forces'" - whatever that means.

Would "substantial support" of an "associated force," mean linking a web-site to a web-site that links to a web-site affiliated with al-Qaeda?  We don't know.  The question is, "do we really want to find out?"

We're told not to worry - that the bill explicitly states that nothing in it shall alter existing law. 

Cruise Control Act of 2011

By admin on August 22, 2011

Federal spending has ballooned 28 percent during the Obama Presidency while the government has amassed more debt than it acquired from the first day of George Washington’s administration to the last day of George H. W. Bush’s.

Our nation is racing toward a fiscal cliff. Yet, as Sen. Jim DeMint noted, instead of hitting the brakes, Congress and the President just set the cruise control. “The Budget Control Act of 2011” offers an object lesson in exactly the sort of empty compromise that has gotten our nation into its present mess. Faced with the devastating consequences of unprecedented and unsustainable federal spending, both parties agreed on only one thing: to lock in that spending for at least the next two years. Bypassing the normal legislative process, the deal was written behind closed doors and dumped it into the laps of both houses under the threat that failing to pay the government’s bills would jeopardize the nation’s triple-A credit.

Unfortunately, the deal didn’t just pay our current bills – it gave the most spendthrift administration in history an open credit line to continue its spending spree beyond 2012. Ironically, it ended up costing the United States its triple-A credit rating by failing to rein in spending significantly. Indeed, Standard and Poor’s had explicitly warned for the last two months that $4 trillion had to be cut from the projected ten-year deficit to preserve the nation’s credit. Even if the plan works perfectly, it doesn’t come close.

Yet the same politicians who ignored these warnings were shocked-just-shocked when Standard and Poor’s lowered the boom four days later. Instead, they blamed the “Tea Party” that has been sounding the same alarm for more than two years.

Full Article: Dissecting the So-Called "Budget Control Act of 2011"

By Tom McClintock on August 2, 2011

The “Budget Control Act of 2011” increases the debt limit by between $2.1 and $2.4 trillion, the biggest explosion of debt in American history.  It allows the government to avoid spending reductions for the next two years while squandering our last best hope of averting a sovereign debt crisis.

I am opposed to this measure for the following reasons:

The Republican Century

By Tom McClintock on May 11, 2009

I want to thank you for your invitation to join you this afternoon, and to especially thank you for your support of the Leadership Institute. I did not realize the true extent of the Institute’s work, and Morton Blackwell’s influence, until my staff learned that I would be addressing you today. It turns out that more than half of them are graduates of the Leadership Institute’s training programs. I should have suspected as much.

Do No Harm

By Tom McClintock on February 12, 2009

M. Speaker:

I rise again to urge the majority to consider very carefully the damage they are doing to our nation’s economy by passing this unprecedented spending measure.

There is still time to heed the warnings from economists across the nation that this bill will do long-term damage to the growth of our nation’s economy for many years to come.

This is not mere economic theory: it is the consistent effect every time and everywhere that governments have tried to spend their way to prosperity.  

A Policy That Doesn't Work

By Tom McClintock on February 10, 2009

M. Speaker:

Benjamin Franklin warned us that “Passion governs, but she never governs wisely.”

As the Congress and the President rush to enact the latest in a long line of mega-spending bills, I think we would be well advised to spend a little more time on the dispassionate math of the matter.

Debate on Referral to Conference Committee of HR 1 Stimulus Bill

By Tom McClintock on February 10, 2009

Mme. Speaker:

Before we continue with a stimulus policy that has consistently failed to stimulate anything but government, I think the supporters of this program need to answer some very simple questions.

For example, the President himself told us yesterday that this $800 billion of new spending will produce up to four million new jobs.  That comes to $200,000 per job.

Speech in Oppoition to H.R. 2 Children's Health Plan

By Tom McClintock on February 4, 2009

M. Speaker:

I saw S-CHIP implemented in California, and I can tell you that it’s a prime example of the law of unintended consequences.  Since its inception, we’ve watched as S-CHIP has been slowly replacing employer health plans with government-paid health plans – with spiraling costs to taxpayers.  Employers discovered that they could avoid their own plans, knowing that their employees would be covered by S-CHIP.

The Plain Math of the Matter

By Tom McClintock on February 4, 2009

M. Speaker:

The mantra we hear from the Left is that government – rather than the productive sector – needs to create new jobs.  According to our new President, the $825 billion spending bill will create 3 million new jobs.

That sounded pretty good to me at a time when our economy is hurting so badly, until I pulled out a pocket calculator and did the math.  Three million new jobs for $825 billion.  Ladies and Gentlemen, that comes to $275,000 per job!

Where Do We Borrow It From?

By Tom McClintock on February 3, 2009

M. Speaker:

When we speak of running up a $2 trillion debt to pay for this year of unprecedented spending, where does that money come from?

We don’t have it, and so we borrow it.

Where do we borrow it from?  We will borrow that $2 trillion from the same pool of funds that would otherwise have been available for businesses seeking to add jobs, or homebuyers seeking to buy homes or consumers seeking to buy new cars or appliances.